Mupirocin/chlorexidine to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: Post hoc analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized trial using mupirocin/chlorhexidine and polymyxin/tobramycin for the prevention of acquired infections in intubated patients

14Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The reduction in acquired infections (AI) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with the mupirocin/ chlorhexidine (M/C) decontamination regimen has not been well studied in intubated patients. We performed post hoc analysis of a prior trial to assess the impact of M/C on MRSA AI and colonization. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study with the primary aim to reduce all-cause AI. The two regimens used [topical polymyxin and tobramycin (P/T), nasal mupirocin with chlorhexidine body wash (M/C), or corresponding placebos for each regimen] were administered according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. Participants were intubated patients in the intensive care units of three French university hospitals. The patients enrolled in the study (n = 515) received either active P/T (n = 130), active M/C (n = 130), both active regimens (n = 129), or placebos only (n = 126) for the period of intubation and an additional 24 h. The incidence and incidence rates (per 1,000 study days) of MRSA AI were assessed. Due to the absence of a statistically significant interaction between the two regimens, analysis was performed at the margins by comparing all patient receiving M/C (n = 259) to all patients not receiving M/C (n = 256), and all patients receiving P/T (n = 259) to all patients not receiving P/T (n = 256). Results: Incidence [odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.16-0.96), P = 0.04] and incidence rates [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.41, 95 % CI 0.17-0.97, P = 0.05] of MRSA AI were significantly lower with the use of M/C. We also observed an increase in the incidence (OR 2.50, 95 % CI 1.01-6.15, P = 0.05) and the incidence rate (IRR 2.90, 95 % CI 1.20-8.03, P = 0.03) of MRSA AI with the use of P/T. Conclusion: Among our study cohort of intubated patients, the use of M/C significantly reduced MRSA AI. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988

5344Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare- associated infections: Summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2009-2010

1330Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus

1008Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Antimicrobial approaches in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of decolonization with chlorhexidine and mupirocin in reducing surgical site infections: A systematic review

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on health care-associated infection in intensive care units: A meta-analysis

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camus, C., Sebille, V., Legras, A., Garo, B., Renault, A., Le Corre, P., … Bellissant, E. (2014). Mupirocin/chlorexidine to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: Post hoc analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized trial using mupirocin/chlorhexidine and polymyxin/tobramycin for the prevention of acquired infections in intubated patients. Infection, 42(3), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-013-0581-1

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

57%

Researcher 7

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

9%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0