Predicting closed questions on community question answering sites using convolutional neural network

16Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Community questions answering sites receive a huge number of questions and answers everyday. It has been observed that a number of questions among them are marked as closed by the site moderators. Such questions increase overhead of the moderators and also create user dissatisfaction. This paper aims to predict whether a newly posted question would be marked as closed in the future or not and also give a tentative reason of being closed. Two models: (1) a baseline model based on traditional machine learning techniques and (2) deep learning models such as convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network are used to classify a question into one of the five classes: (1) open, (2) off-topic, (3) not a real question, (4) too constructive and (5) too localized. The baseline model requires the handcrafted features and hence does not preserve semantics. However, CNN and LSTM networks are capable of preserving the semantics of question’s word and extracting the hidden features from the textual content using multiple hidden layers. The LSTM network performs better compared to CNN and traditional machine learning models. The proposed model can be used as an initial filter to screen the closed question at the time of posting, which reduced the overheads of site moderators. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that predicts the closed question along with the reason the question will be closed. This helps the questioner to modify the question before posting. The experimental results with the dataset of Stack Overflow prove the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roy, P. K., & Singh, J. P. (2020). Predicting closed questions on community question answering sites using convolutional neural network. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(14), 10555–10572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04592-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free