Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Examining the European Union’s (EU) engagement with Central Asia since the early 1990s, we see an increased commitment to context sensitivity. Arguably, in order to design ‘better’ interventions, the EU needs to know more about this region. This article explores three means of EU learning: in the field–through EU officials’ first-hand experience of working at EU Delegations in Central Asia; about the field–through programmed channels of external expert knowledge, and in particular think tanks; and from the field–during institutionalized consultations with multiple local actors, such as academics, journalists and non-governmental organizations. It is argued that despite this complex learning infrastructure, EU knowledge production on Central Asia has a predominantly performative character. Rather than leading to changes in its relations with Central Asia, new knowledge produced by the EU aims at legitimizing this organization’s pre-existing frameworks of engagement and practices of interactions with the region, and substantiating existing policy priorities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korneev, O., & Kluczewska, K. (2022). Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 41(4), 654–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2095352

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free