Collective dynamics of 'small-world9 networks

32.9kCitations
Citations of this article
10.5kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Networks of coupled dynamical systems have been used to model biological oscillators 1-4, Josephson junction arrays5,6, excitable media7, neural networks8-10, spatial games", genetic control networks12 and many other self-organizing systems. Ordinarily, the connection topology is assumed to be either completely regular or completely random. But many biological, technological and social networks lie somewhere between these two extremes. Here we explore simple models of networks that can be tuned through this middle ground: regular networks 'rewired' to introduce increasing amounts of disorder. We find that these systems can be highly clustered, like regular lattices, yet have small characteristic path lengths, like random graphs. We call them 'small-world' networks, by analogy with the small-world phenomenon13'14 (popularly known as six degrees of separation15). The neural network of the worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the power grid of the western United States, and the collaboration graph of film actors are shown to be small-world networks. Models of dynamical systems with small-world coupling display enhanced signal-propagation speed, computational power, and synchronizability. In particular, infectious diseases spread more easily in small-world networks than in regular lattices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ’small-world9 networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free