Coupled Poroelastic Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing-Induced Seismicity: Implications for Understanding the Post Shut-In ML 2.9 Earthquake at the Preston New Road, UK

10Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Post-injection seismicity associated with hydraulic stimulation has posed great challenges to hydraulic fracturing operations. This work aims to identify the causal mechanism of the post shut-in ML 2.9 earthquake in August 2019 at the Preston New Road, UK, amongst three plausible mechanisms, that is, the post shut-in pore pressure diffusion, poroelastic stressing on a non-overpressurized fault, and poroelastic stressing on an overpressurized fault. A 3D fully coupled poroelastic model that considers the poroelastic solid deformation, fluid flow in both porous rocks and fracture structures, and hydrofracturing-induced pressure perturbations was developed to simulate the hydromechanical response of the shale reservoir formation to hydraulic fracturing operations at the site. Based on the model results, Coulomb stress changes and seismicity rate were further evaluated on the PNR-2 fault responsible for the earthquake. Model results have shown that increased pore pressure plays a dominant role in triggering the fault slippage, although the poroelastic stress may have acted to promote the slippage. Amongst the three plausible mechanisms, the post shut-in pore pressure diffusion is the most favored in terms of Coulomb stress change, seismicity rate, timing of fault slippage and rupture area. The coupled modeling results suggested that the occurrence of the post shut-in ML 2.9 earthquake was a three-staged process, involving first propagation of fracture tips that stimulated surrounding reservoir formations, then hydraulic connection with and subsequent pore pressure diffusion to the conductive PNR-2 fault, and eventually fault activation primarily under the direct impact of increased pore pressure.

References Powered by Scopus

A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering

1301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip

625Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system

619Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Induced seismicity associated with geothermal fluids re-injection: Poroelastic stressing, thermoelastic stressing, or transient cooling-induced permeability enhancement?

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the variability in hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity occurrence between North American shale plays

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Ensemble Approach to CharacterizingTrailing-Induced Seismicity

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, W., Verdon, J. P., & Tao, M. (2022). Coupled Poroelastic Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing-Induced Seismicity: Implications for Understanding the Post Shut-In ML 2.9 Earthquake at the Preston New Road, UK. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023376

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Researcher 5

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

50%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

36%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0