Dysplastic vs. common naevus-associated vs. de novo melanomas: An observational retrospective study of 1,021 patients

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this case-case study was to determine the differences between dysplastic and common naevus-associated melanomas (NAM) and de novo melanomas. A total of 1,021 prospectively collected patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma from an oncology referral centre were included in the study. Of these, 75.51% had de novo melanomas, 12.93% dysplastic NAM, and 11.56% common NAM. Dysplastic NAM, compared with de novo melanomas, were associated with intermittently photo-exposed sites, atypical melanocytic naevi, decreased tumour thickness, and presence of MC1R non-synonymous variants. Common NAM presented more frequently on the trunk and were of the superficial spreading type. Comparison of dysplastic with common NAM showed significant difference only with regard to mitoses. Both subtypes of NAM shared less aggressive traits than de novo melanomas, albeit with no significant differences in survival after multivariate adjustment. In conclusion, NAM present with less aggressive traits, mostly due to a greater awareness among patients of changing moles than due to their intrinsic biological characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin-Gorgojo, A., Requena, C., Garcia-Casado, Z., Traves, V., Kumar, R., & Nagore, E. (2018). Dysplastic vs. common naevus-associated vs. de novo melanomas: An observational retrospective study of 1,021 patients. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 98(6), 556–562. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2908

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free