Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure

75Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) has been indicated in the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) if conservative treatment fails. Invasive MV is associated to a variety of complications. The recent innovations of noninvasive methods of MV (NMV) avoid the complications of invasive MV, whilst ensuring a similar degree of efficacy. A review of the literature from 1989 to 1995 shows that use of NMV in ARF has been reported in several studies involving more than 400 patients most of them COPD. NMV was successful from 51 to 91%, the severity of ARF being widely different among the different studies. Most of the studies compared effectiveness of NMV with historical groups of patients treated with 'conventional' medical therapy whilst controlled studies of NMV versus ET intubation are lacking. Type of mask, mode of ventilation, compliance to treatment, type of patient and severity of disease may influence the success rate. Success with NMV was associated with less severely abnormal baseline clinical and functional parameters and to less severe levels of acidosis assessed during an initial trial of NMV. Therefore, NMV may be useful in selected patients with ARF. Patients should have clinical and physiological evidence of ARF and should be sufficiently cooperative. It is commonly said that NMV should be avoided, and endotracheal (ET) intubation performed in patients with haemodynamic instability, uncontrolled arrhythmias, gastrointestinal bleeding, high risk for aspiration. With these limitations NMV in selected patients with ARF is well tolerated and may be useful in avoiding ET intubation in most cases of COPD and with a wide range of success rates in other disease. This in turn has several advantages in terms of avoiding complications of invasive MV, reducing the length of stay in ICU and probably the number of ICU readmissions. Side effects of NMV seem less severe than those induced by invasive MV. In conclusion in selected patients a trial of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, as an adjunct to medical therapy, should be instituted at an early stage of ARF episodes before severe acidosis ensures, to avoid ET intubation.

References Powered by Scopus

APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system

14550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1808Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients

1062Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hepatitis B virus infection

2222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria

384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Which Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Benefit from Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation? A Systematic Review of the Literature

357Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ambrosino, N. (1996, April). Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.96.09040795

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 7

41%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

70%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

13%

Engineering 3

13%

Computer Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0