Epidemiological and entomological evaluations after six years or more of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in Nigeria

49Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current strategy for interrupting transmission of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is annual mass drug administration (MDA), at good coverage, for 6 or more years. We describe our programmatic experience delivering the MDA combination of ivermectin and albendazole in Plateau and Nasarawa states in central Nigeria, where LF is caused by anopheline transmitted Wuchereria bancrofti. Baseline LF mapping using rapid blood antigen detection tests showed mean local government area (LGA) prevalence of 23% (range 4-62%). MDA was launched in 2000 and by 2003 had been scaled up to full geographic coverage in all 30 LGAs in the two states; over 26 million cumulative directly observed treatments were provided by community drug distributors over the intervention period. Reported treatment coverage for each round was ≥85% of the treatment eligible population of 3.7 million, although a population-based coverage survey in 2003 showed lower coverage (72.2%; 95% CI 65.5-79.0%). To determine impact on transmission, we monitored three LF infection parameters (microfilaremia, antigenemia, and mosquito infection) in 10 sentinel villages (SVs) serially. The last monitoring was done in 2009, when SVs had been treated for 7-10 years. Microfilaremia in 2009 decreased by 83% from baseline (from 4.9% to 0.8%); antigenemia by 67% (from 21.6% to 7.2%); mosquito infection rate (all larval stages) by 86% (from 3.1% to 0.4%); and mosquito infectivity rate (L3 stages) by 76% (from 1.3% to 0.3%). All changes were statistically significant. Results suggest that LF transmission has been interrupted in 5 of the 10 SVs, based on 2009 finding of microfilaremia ≥1% and/or L3 stages in mosquitoes. Four of the five SVs where transmission persists had baseline antigenemia prevalence of >25%. Longer or additional interventions (e.g., more frequent MDA treatments, insecticidal bed nets) should be considered for 'hot spots' where transmission is ongoing.

References Powered by Scopus

The ICT filariasis test: A rapid-format antigen test for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis

368Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Feasibility of onchocerciasis elimination with ivermectin treatment in endemic foci in Africa: First evidence from studies in Mali and Senegal

286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lymphatic Filariasis: Treatment, Control and Elimination

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Disease eradication

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nigeria: "Ground zero" for the high prevalence neglected tropical diseases

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modelling the distribution and transmission intensity of lymphatic filariasis in sub-Saharan Africa prior to scaling up interventions: Integrated use of geostatistical and mathematical modelling

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richards, F. O., Eigege, A., Miri, E. S., Kal, A., Umaru, J., Pam, D., … Hopkins, D. R. (2011). Epidemiological and entomological evaluations after six years or more of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in Nigeria. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001346

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

69%

Researcher 18

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 35

52%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

31%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

9%

Social Sciences 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free