A Survey of English Sixth Formers' Knowledge of Early Brain Development

0Citations
Citations of this article
147Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain the knowledge of young people aged 16 to 19 of early brain development and their attitudes towards the care of babies and preschool children. Design: Cross-sectional, school- and college-based survey including all sixth form students present on the days of data collection. The survey instrument comprised forced-choice questions in four sections: Demographics, Perceptions and Understanding of Early Childhood Development, Parental Behaviors to Support Early Brain development, and Resource Needs and Usage. Setting: Two sixth form schools and one sixth form college in three towns of varying affluence in the West Midlands of the United Kingdom. Method: The survey was mounted online and completed by 905 students who returned it directly to the researcher. Results: Most students knew that tobacco, alcohol, and drugs are hazardous in pregnancy, and many recognized the impact of maternal stress on fetal brain development. Many believed that babies can be “spoiled” and did not appreciate the importance of reading to babies and of the relationship between play and early brain development. A significant minority thought that physical activity and a healthy diet have little impact on young children's development. Respondents said they would turn firstly to their parents for advice on baby care rather than professionals. Conclusion: Young people need educating about parenting activities that support the all-round healthy development of infants. The importance of a healthy diet, physical activity, reading, and play should be included in sixth form curricula and antenatal classes. Consideration should be given to educating grandparents because of their influence on new parents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nolan, M. (2017). A Survey of English Sixth Formers’ Knowledge of Early Brain Development. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 38(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X17749565

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free