Bayesian variable selection with joint modeling of categorical and survival outcomes: An application to individualizing chemotherapy treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

13Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States, with more than 130,000 new cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed each year. Clinical studies have shown that genetic alterations lead to different responses to the same treatment, despite the morphologic similarities of tumors. A molecular test prior to treatment could help in determining an optimal treatment for a patient with regard to both toxicity and efficacy. This article introduces a statistical method appropriate for predicting and comparing multiple endpoints given different treatment options and molecular profiles of an individual. A latent variable-based multivariate regression model with structured variance covariance matrix is considered here. The latent variables account for the correlated nature of multiple endpoints and accommodate the fact that some clinical endpoints are categorical variables and others are censored variables. The mixture normal hierarchical structure admits a natural variable selection rule. Inference was conducted using the posterior distribution sampling Markov chain Monte Carlo method. We analyzed the finite-sample properties of the proposed method using simulation studies. The application to the advanced colorectal cancer study revealed associations between multiple endpoints and particular biomarkers, demonstrating the potential of individualizing treatment based on genetic profiles. © 2009, The International Biometric Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, W., Ghosh, D., Raghunathan, T. E., & Sargent, D. J. (2009). Bayesian variable selection with joint modeling of categorical and survival outcomes: An application to individualizing chemotherapy treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Biometrics, 65(4), 1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01181.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free