Terbinafine and itraconazole resistance in dermatophytes

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Terbinafine-resistant dermatophytes in patients were exceptional before the second decade of this century. However, acquired resistance to commonly used antifungal compounds has recently emerged in several countries. Resistance towards terbinafine is generated by missense mutations in the squalene epoxidase enzyme targeted by the drug, while recorded resistance towards azoles is due to the overexpression of genes encoding multidrug transporters of the ABC family. At present, approximately 1% of Trichophyton rubrum isolates from Tinea pedis and onychomycosis in Switzerland are resistant to terbinafine. Terbinafine-resistant T. rubrum was also isolated from extended Tinea corporis in patients more susceptible to fungal infections and requiring continuous treatment. Repeated topical and systemic treatments with terbinafine have likely contributed to the development of terbinafine resistance in patients. The prevalence of T. rubrum resistant to terbinafine in Europe contrasts with that of resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates in India (30-70%). If drugs on the open market and overmedication can partly explain this alarming situation, several indications also allow the suspicion of an origin linked to environmental problems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monod, M., Feuermann, M., & Yamada, T. (2021). Terbinafine and itraconazole resistance in dermatophytes. In Dermatophytes and Dermatophytoses (pp. 415–429). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67421-2_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free