Modeling and Analysis of Deception Games Based on Hypergame Theory

11Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss a deception game where attackers and defenders can have different perceptions towards a given situation. Although existing game theories have considered incomplete information to consider uncertainty, how players’ different perceptions or misperceptions can affect their decisionmaking has not been fully addressed. In particular, we discuss hypergame theory which has been used to resolve conflicts under uncertainty. In this chapter, we examine how a player’s perception (or misperception) affects their decision-making in choosing a best strategy based on hypergame theory. To deliver a concrete idea on how the attack–defense game can be modeled based on hypergame theory, we model a simple cybergame scenario and demonstrate an example probability model using Stochastic Petri Nets. Through the evaluation of the model, we show the experimental results to deliver insightful findings in terms of the relationships between perceptions by different players (i.e., an attacker or a defender), their chosen best strategies, and corresponding utilities. Lastly, we measure performance of the attacker and the defender in terms of attack success probability and mean time to security failure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, J. H., Zhu, M., & Singh, M. (2019). Modeling and Analysis of Deception Games Based on Hypergame Theory. In Autonomous Cyber Deception: Reasoning, Adaptive Planning, and Evaluation of HoneyThings (pp. 49–74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02110-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free