Adult Measures

Abstract

As noted in Chapter 6, empirically based measures for assessing social skills in adults have primarily utilized self-report and analogue observational assessment approaches. Meier and Hope (1998) have described a sample clinical interview approach to assessing social skills but, to date, no data have been collected supporting the reliability or validity of this measure. Although observation systems are frequently used in assessing social competence, few of these use naturalistic approaches for adults due to the ethical constraints and potential reactivity effects of collecting naturalistic observations. Some observational assessment systems could be considered naturalistic in that assessments are regularly recorded during daily activities in inpatient units (e.g., Paul, 1984), although such systems seldom specifically assess social skills. Similarly, some (e.g., Segrin, 1998) have collected surreptitiously gathered video recordings of waiting room behavior as an index of naturalistic behavior, although the ethics of collecting these data in clinical practice is questionable. Clinicians desiring to conduct an assessment of social skills under more naturalistic conditions may wish to consult Bellack, Morrison, Mueser, Wade, and Sayers (1990), Curran (1982), Frisch and Higgins (1986), Gorecki, Dickson, Anderson, and Jones (1981), Kern (1991a), Merluzzi and Biever (1987), St. Lawrence, Kirksey, and Moore (1983), and Wessberg, Marriotto, Conger, Farrell, and Conger (1979) for examples of how naturalistic observations of social skills have been conducted in research protocols. Given the paucity of validated peer or other report, clinician interview, and naturalistic observation assessments, the bulk of this chapter provides descriptions of evidence-based self-report measures and analogue observational schemes for assessing social skills in adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)