Methods that equate temporary carbon storage with permanent CO2 emission reductions lead to false claims on temperature alignment

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There has been renewed interest in equating temporary carbon storage with permanent CO2 emission reductions, both within corporate GHG inventories and for carbon offset accounting. Proposed methods discount future emissions, such that carbon stored temporarily can be accounted for as (some fraction of) a permanent reduction in emissions. These approaches are problematic as long-term temperature change is primarily caused by cumulative CO2 emissions and delayed emissions accumulate in the atmosphere the same as any other emission of CO2. This perspective article uses illustrative examples to show how discounting future emissions results in false temperature alignment and net zero claims. We recommend that emissions and removals should be reported without discounting to ensure that GHG accounts accurately reflect contribution to cumulative emissions. There is value in temporarily storing carbon, e.g. it can reduce peak warming and buy time to implement permanent mitigation measures, but it cannot be treated as equivalent to permanent mitigation, and alternative approaches should be used to convey the value of temporary storage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brander, M., & Broekhoff, D. (2023). Methods that equate temporary carbon storage with permanent CO2 emission reductions lead to false claims on temperature alignment. Carbon Management. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2023.2284714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free