Comparison of Amplified ELISA and Mouse Bioassay Procedures for Determination of Botulinal Toxins A, B, E, and F

37Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (amp-ELISA) was compared to the mouse bioassay for determination of botulinal neurotoxin types A, B, E, and F. Twelve different toxin-producing type A, 13 proteolytic type B, 9 nonproteolytic type B, 16 type E, 8 proteolytic type F, 5 nonproteolytic type F, and 6 nontoxigenic clostridial strains were tested. The cultures were inoculated into cooked meat medium (CMM) and tryptone-peptone-glucose-yeast extract (TPGY) medium, incubated for 5 days, and then examined for biological toxicity in mice and amp-ELISA endpoints. The amp-ELISA was less sensitive in detecting toxins produced by nonproteolytic than proteolytic strains of type B and F organisms. All of the toxin-producing strains tested were positive by the AOAC method and the amp-ELISA in either undiluted TPGY or CMM culture fluids regardless of mouse toxicity level, source, or strain. Cross-reactivity was observed between some but not all of the botulinal strains tested. None of the nontoxigenic strains were positive by the amp-ELISA. Purified botulinal toxins were also assayed using these 2 methods. The sensitivity of the amp-ELISA using purified neurotoxins was about 0.1 ng/mL for types A, B, and E and about 1.0 ng/mL for type F.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, J. L. (2001). Comparison of Amplified ELISA and Mouse Bioassay Procedures for Determination of Botulinal Toxins A, B, E, and F. Journal of AOAC International, 84(1), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/84.1.85

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free