Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

12Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = − 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = − 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.

References Powered by Scopus

48629Citations
9275Readers
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

45898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
42603Citations
7216Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Anxiety and Depression Among Latin American University Students: A Randomized Clinical Trial

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early childhood appetitive traits and eating disorder symptoms in adolescence: a 10-year longitudinal follow-up study in the Netherlands and the UK

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guided self-help treatment for children and young people with threshold and subthreshold eating disorders: A pilot study protocol

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant-Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2023, December 1). Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

20%

Social Sciences 3

20%

Psychology 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 8

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free