Factional Model-making in China: Party Elites' Open Political Contention in the Policy Process

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article introduces the analytical framework of factional model-making to describe and explain the open political contention of Chinese Communist Party elites in the policy process. Party elites undertake factional model-making to express policy disagreements and to signal their power to the regime: by flouting the Party line publicly without punishment, they show that they can influence the Party line and therefore pressurize the regime into acknowledging their position in the opaque power structure. This article chronicles the history of factional model-making from the 1960s to 2012 and examines in detail the making of Henan's Nanjie Village into a re-collectivization model by the Party's left. The process began in the 1990s and ended soon after Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, which prompted Nanjie's patrons to recast the village as a Party model trumpeting Xi's line. The suppression of factional model-making under Xi is discussed in the conclusion.

References Powered by Scopus

Local initiative and national reform: The wenzhou model of development

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The end of the CCP's resilient authoritarianism? A tripartite assessment of shifting power in China

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maximum tinkering under uncertainty: Unorthodox lessons from China

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheung, O. (2022). Factional Model-making in China: Party Elites’ Open Political Contention in the Policy Process. China Quarterly, 251, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574102200008X

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

64%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

18%

Linguistics 1

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0