Effects of Preserving Anatomically Positioned and Adequate Remnant ACL Tissue in Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The advantages of remnant tissue preservation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remain controversial. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that a large amount of remnant tissue, especially if anatomically positioned, would improve patient-reported outcomes and second-look graft appearance after preserved double-bundle ACLR (DB-ACLR). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This retrospective study included 89 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral remnant-preserving DB-ACLR using 2 hamstring tendon autografts. The authors categorized the arthroscopic findings into 3 groups according to the location and volume of the ACL remnant tissue in the femoral notch: (1) anatomical attachment (group AA; n = 34); (2) nonanatomical attachment (group NA; n = 33); and (3) no remnant (group NR; n = 22). Based on second-look arthroscopy, the reconstructed graft was graded as excellent, fair, or poor. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 2 years after surgery using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Japanese Anterior Cruciate Ligament Questionnaire–25 (JACL-25). Results: The AA and NA groups had a significantly shorter time from injury to surgery compared with the NR group (P =.0165). Considering the second-look arthroscopic findings, the authors found a significant difference in synovial coverage of the grafts between the 3 groups (P =.0018). There were no significant differences in the overall KOOS and JACL-25 score among the 3 groups; however, the KOOS–Sport and Recreation and KOOS–Quality of Life subscale scores were significantly higher in the AA group compared with the NA and NR groups (P =.0014 and.0039, respectively). The JACL-25 score for middle- to high-speed flexion and extension was significantly better in the AA group versus the NR group (P =.0261). Conclusion: This study showed that preserving anatomically positioned and adequate remnant tissue during DB-ACLR improved second-look graft appearance and KOOS–Sport and Recreation and KOOS–Quality of Life scores.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sato, D., Inoue, M., Kasahara, Y., Hamano, H., Suzuki, R., Kondo, E., & Iwasaki, N. (2023). Effects of Preserving Anatomically Positioned and Adequate Remnant ACL Tissue in Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231162389

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free