Cell-based assays and molecular dynamics analysis of a boron-containing agonist with different profiles of binding to human and guinea pig beta2 adrenoceptors

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The design of beta2 adrenoceptor (β 2 AR) agonists is attractive because of their wide-ranging applications in medicine, and the details of agonist interactions with β 2 AR are interesting because it is considered a prototype for G-protein coupled receptors. Preclinical studies for agonist development have involved biological assays with guinea pigs due to a similar physiology to humans. Boron-containing Albuterol derivatives (BCADs) designed as bronchodilators have improved potency and efficacy compared with their boron-free precursor on guinea pig β 2 ARs (gpβ 2 ARs), and two of the BCADs (BR-AEA and boronterol) conserve these features on cells expressing human β 2 ARs (hβ 2 ARs). The aim of this study was to test the BCAD Politerol on gpβ 2 ARs and hβ 2 ARs in vitro and in silico. Politerol displayed higher potency and efficacy on gpβ 2 AR than on hβ 2 AR in experimental assays, possible explanations are provided based on molecular modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations of about 0.25 µs were performed for the free and bound states adding up to 2 µs in total. There were slight differences, particularly in the role of the boron atom, in the interactions of Politerol with gpβ 2 ARs and hβ 2 ARs, affecting movements of transmembrane domains 5–7, known to be pivotal in receptor activation. These findings could be instrumental in the design of compounds selective for hβ 2 ARs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soriano-Ursúa, M. A., Bello, M., Hernández-Martínez, C. F., Santillán-Torres, I., Guerrero-Ramírez, R., Correa-Basurto, J., … Trujillo-Ferrara, J. G. (2019). Cell-based assays and molecular dynamics analysis of a boron-containing agonist with different profiles of binding to human and guinea pig beta2 adrenoceptors. European Biophysics Journal, 48(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1336-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free