STAT3 or USF2 Contributes to HIF Target Gene Specificity

34Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The HIF1- and HIF2-mediated transcriptional responses play critical roles in solid tumor progression. Despite significant similarities, including their binding to promoters of both HIF1 and HIF2 target genes, HIF1 and HIF2 proteins activate unique subsets of target genes under hypoxia. The mechanism for HIF target gene specificity has remained unclear. Using siRNA or inhibitor, we previously reported that STAT3 or USF2 is specifically required for activation of endogenous HIF1 or HIF2 target genes. In this study, using reporter gene assays and chromatin immuno-precipitation, we find that STAT3 or USF2 exhibits specific binding to the promoters of HIF1 or HIF2 target genes respectively even when over-expressed. Functionally, HIF1α interacts with STAT3 to activate HIF1 target gene promoters in a HIF1α HLH/PAS and N-TAD dependent manner while HIF2α interacts with USF2 to activate HIF2 target gene promoters in a HIF2α N-TAD dependent manner. Physically, HIF1α HLH and PAS domains are required for its interaction with STAT3 while both N- and C-TADs of HIF2α are involved in physical interaction with USF2. Importantly, addition of functional USF2 binding sites into a HIF1 target gene promoter increases the basal activity of the promoter as well as its response to HIF2+USF2 activation while replacing HIF binding site with HBS from a HIF2 target gene does not change the specificity of the reporter gene. Importantly, RNA Pol II on HIF1 or HIF2 target genes is primarily associated with HIF1α or HIF2α in a STAT3 or USF2 dependent manner. Thus, we demonstrate here for the first time that HIF target gene specificity is achieved by HIF transcription partners that are required for HIF target gene activation, exhibit specific binding to the promoters of HIF1 or HIF2 target genes and selectively interact with HIF1α or HIF2α protein. © 2013 Pawlus et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. STAT3 or USF2 alone or with HIF1α or HIF2α to activate the cloned promoters of HIF1 or HIF2 target genes in 293T cells. A) Schematic presentation of the promoters of HIF1 target genes PGK1 and CA9. B) Schematic presentation of the promoters/enhancers of HIF2 target genes PAI1 and EPO. Predicted STAT3 {TT(N) 4-6AA} binding sites (black solid boxes), USF binding sites (CANNTG) (gray boxes), and HIF binding sites (HBS, ACGTG) (white boxes) are indicated. Previously validated HIF and USF2 binding sites are indicated by bold boxes. C) Western blot analysis of Flag-tagged STAT3C, USF2, HIF1αTM and HIF2αTM to monitor the expression of these plasmids in reporter gene assays for Figure 1D-E. Anti-beta actin was for loading control of total protein for this figure and others in the study. D) Fold of induction of CA9/Luc and PGK1/Luc reporters activated by the indicated plasmids. E) Fold of induction of PAI1/Luc and EPO/Luc reporters activated by the indicated plasmids.
  • Figure 2. USF2 functions alone or with HIF2α to activate endogenous HIF2 target genes in normoxic Hep3B cells. A) Western blot analysis of Flag-tagged USF2, HIF1αTM and HIF2αTM to monitor the expression of these plasmids in transfected Hep3B cells. The starts * indicate several HIF2α protein bands expressed from the vector. B) mRNA levels of HIF1 target genes, PGK1, GLUT1, LDHA and CA9, in normoxic Hep3B cells in response to transient transfection of the indicated plasmids. C) mRNA levels of HIF2 target genes, EPO, PAI1, OCT4 and PLAC8, in normoxic Hep3B cells in response to transient transfection of the indicated plasmids.
  • Figure 3. STAT3 and USF2 are enriched on the promoters of HIF1 or HIF2 targets respectively. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed in chromatin lysates from normoxic RCC4 (A) or hypoxic Hep3B cells (C). Antibodies against STAT3 or USF2 were used to co-precipitate STAT3- and USF2-associated genomic DNA. Q-PCR was used to detect the promoters of HIF1 target genes, CA9 and PGK1, the enhancer or promoter of HIF2 target genes, EPO and PAI1, or the HIF1/HIF2 common target, VEGF. Results were normalized to input samples as % of input. The relative fold binding was calculated by dividing each of the % input values by the % input value of STAT3 associated with CA9 promoter here in Figure 3A. Similar calculations were made for Figure 3C and ChIP/Re-ChIP in Figure 9. B) The relative expression levels of CA9, PAI1 and VEGF mRNAs in normoxic RCC4 cells. D) The fold of induction of HIF1 target genes CA9 and PGK1, HIF2 target genes PAI1 and EPO in hypoxic Hep3B cells.
  • Figure 4. STAT3 increases the binding kinetics of HIF1α protein on its target gene promoters of CA9, PGK1 and VEGF in hypoxic RCC4T cells. Detection of HIF1α or STAT3 on the promoters of HIF1 target genes, CA9 (A), PGK1 (B) and VEGF (C) in RCC4T cells with or without STAT3 inhibitor S3I-201, cultured under normoxia or hypoxia for 1, 3, 8 and 16 hours. Results were expressed as % input DNA for easy appreciation of binding changes.
  • Figure 5. N-TADs of HIF1α or HIF2α is required for its functional interaction with STAT3 or USF2 to activate HIF1 or HIF2 target gene promoter. A) Schematic presentation of HIF1αDPA (Double Proline to Alanine), HIF2αDPA and HIF1α/HIF2α hybrid constructs. B) Western blot analysis of HIF1α, HIF2α, HIF hybrids and STAT3 to monitor the protein expression during CA9/Luc reporter gene assays. C) Activation of HIF1 target gene reporter, CA9/Luc, by the indicated plasmids. HIS is an empty vector that contains a histidine tag only. D) Western blot analysis of HIF1α, HIF2α, HIF hybrids and USF2 to monitor the protein expression during PAI1/Luc reporter gene assays. E) Activation of HIF2 target gene reporter, PAI1/Luc, by the indicated plasmids.
  • Figure 6. The HIF1α/STAT3 physical interaction requires the HIF1α bHLH and PAS domains. A) WB detection of STAT3, HIF1α and HIF2α in cell lysate (input) prepared from normoxic RCC4 cells, in precipitated materials from the protein A/protein G beads and pre-immuno serum (beads) or in precipitated materials from STAT3 antibody and protein A/protein G beads (STAT3-IP). B) Schematic presentation of Flag-tagged full-length (HIF1α), N-terminal (HIF1α-N) or C-terminal (HIF1α-C) halves of HIF1αTM or HIF1αTM-Flag deletion of bHLH (HIF1α∆bHLH) or PAS domains (HIF1α∆PAS). C) Anti-Flag or anti-HA WB detection of Flagtagged HIF1α or HA-tagged STAT3C protein in cell lysates (Lysates) or in anti-Flag beads precipitated materials (IP). The red stars indicate the precipitated FL, HIF1α-N and HIF1α-C proteins. The percentage of co-precipitated STAT3 protein was calculated by dividing the density of the "anti-HA IP" band by the density of the "anti-Flag IP" bands to control for the different amount of precipitated Flag-tagged HIFα protein. Similar calculation was performed for Figure 6D and Figure 7C-D. D) Anti-Flag or anti-HA WB detection of Flag-tagged HIF1α or HA-tagged STAT3C protein in cell lysates (Lysates) or in anti-Flag beads precipitated materials (IP).
  • Figure 7. The HIF2α/USF2 physical interaction requires the C-TAD and N-TAD of the HIF2α protein. A) WB detection of USF2, HIF1α and HIF2α in RCC4 cell lysate (input), in precipitated materials by the protein A/protein G beads and pre-immuno serum (beads) or in precipitated materials by USF2 antibody and protein A/protein G beads (USF2-IP). B) Schematic presentation of Flag-tagged full-length (HIF2α), N-terminal (HIF2α-N) or C-terminal (HIF2α-C) halves of HIF2αTM or HIF2α deletion of N-TAD (HIF2α∆NTAD), IH (HIF2α∆IH) or C-TAD (HIF2α∆CTAD). C) Anti-Flag or anti-HA WB detection of Flag-tagged HIF2α or HA-tagged USF2 protein in cell lysates (Lysates) or in anti-Flag beads precipitated materials (IP). The red starts indicated the positions of HIF2αFL, HIF2α-N and HIF2α-C proteins. The Δ labeled band in USF2+HIF2-C lane was consistently observed, likely expressed from downstream ATG of HIF2α cDNA. D) Anti-Flag or anti-HA WB detection of Flag-tagged HIF2α or HA-tagged USF2 protein in cell lysates (Lysates) or in anti-Flag beads precipitated materials (IP). The background signals in USF2-HA only lane was deducted from the “anti-HA IP’ signal to calculate the % IP.
  • Figure 8. The role of HIF and USF2 binding sites on HIF target gene specificity. A) Schematic presentation of the CA9 promoters, a HIF1 target gene. Construct 1 was generated by inserting 2 copies of -191 HBS of PAI1 promoter, a HIF2 target gene near the -13 HBS of CA9 promoter. Constructs 2 and 3 were generated by inserting -684 and -565 USF2 binding sites of PAI1 promoter near the -13 HBS (construct 2) or near -1001 of CA9 promoter (construct 3). B) Schematic presentation of a shorter version of CA9 promoters (-506/+25). Construct 4 was generated by replacing the original -13 HBS with -191 HBS of PAI1 promoter. Constructs 5 and 6 were generated by replacing the STAT3 binding sites at -499 and -464 of CA9 promoter with -191 HBS (construct 5) or -684 and -565 USF2 binding sites (construct 6) from the PAI1 promoter. Construct 7 was made by replaced -13 HBS and -499 and -464 STAT3 binding sites in the CA9 promoter with HBS and USF2 binding sites from PAI1 promoter. C) Fold of induction of CA9/Luc reporters (-1096/+25) activated by the indicated plasmids. D) Fold of induction of CA9/Luc reporters (-506/+25) activated by the indicated plasmids. The same activators used in Figure 1 were used for experiments here.

References Powered by Scopus

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O<inf>2</inf> tension

5470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine

2585Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Purification and characterization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1

1843Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α is a critical transcription factor for IL-10-producing B cells in autoimmune disease

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hypoxic Induction of Vasorin Regulates Notch1 Turnover to Maintain Glioma Stem-like Cells

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer stem cells and tumor-associated macrophages: A roadmap for multitargeting strategies

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pawlus, M. R., Wang, L., Murakami, A., Dai, G., & Hu, C. J. (2013). STAT3 or USF2 Contributes to HIF Target Gene Specificity. PLoS ONE, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072358

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

52%

Researcher 7

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 14

44%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

19%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0