Sprint exercise snacks: a novel approach to increase aerobic fitness

30Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Sprint interval training (SIT), involving brief intermittent bursts of vigorous exercise within a single training session, is a time-efficient way to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). It is unclear whether performing sprints spread throughout the day with much longer (≥ 1 h) recovery periods can similarly improve CRF, potentially allowing individuals to perform “sprint snacks” throughout the day to gain health benefits. Methods: Healthy, young, inactive adults (~ 22 years, peak oxygen uptake [VO 2 peak] ~ 35 ml kg − 1  min − 1 ) were randomly assigned to one of two groups and performed 18 training sessions over 6 wks. Sprint snacks (SS) involved 3 × 20-s ‘all out’ cycling bouts separated by 1–4-h rest (n = 12, 7 females). Traditional SIT involved 3 × 20-s bouts interspersed with 3-min rest within a 10-min training session (n = 16, 7 females). The primary outcome was CRF determined by a VO 2 peak test conducted before and after training. Secondary outcomes included a 150 kJ cycling time trial and exercise enjoyment. Results: Absolute VO 2 peak increased by ~ 6% after SIT and ~ 4% for SS (main effect of time P = 0.002) with no difference between groups (group × time interaction, P = 0.52). 150 kJ time trial performance improved by ~ 13% in SIT and ~ 9% in SS (main effect of time, P < 0.001) with no difference between groups (group × time interaction, P = 0.36). Conclusion: CRF was similarly increased by a protocol involving sprint snacks spread throughout the day and a traditional SIT protocol in which bouts were separated by short recovery periods within a single training session.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Little, J. P., Langley, J., Lee, M., Myette-Côté, E., Jackson, G., Durrer, C., … Jung, M. E. (2019). Sprint exercise snacks: a novel approach to increase aerobic fitness. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(5), 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04110-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free