Collective decision-making under changing social environments among agents adapted to sparse connectivity

  • Mann R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Humans and other animals often follow the decisions made by others because these are indicative of the quality of possible choices, resulting in ‘social response rules’, that is, observed relationships between the probability that an agent will make a specific choice and the decisions other individuals have made. The form of social responses can be understood by considering the behaviour of rational agents that seek to maximise their expected utility using both social and private information. Previous derivations of social responses assume that agents observe all others within a group, but real interaction networks are often characterised by sparse connectivity. Here, I analyse the observable behaviour of rational agents that attend to the decisions made by a subset of others in the group. This reveals an adaptive strategy in sparsely connected networks based on highly simplified social information, that is, the difference in the observed number of agents choosing each option. Where agents employ this strategy, collective outcomes and decision-making efficacy are controlled by the social connectivity at the time of the decision, rather than that to which the agents are accustomed, providing an important caveat for sociality observed in the laboratory and suggesting a basis for the social dynamics of highly connected online communities.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mann, R. P. (2022). Collective decision-making under changing social environments among agents adapted to sparse connectivity. Collective Intelligence, 1(2), 263391372211213. https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221121347

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

38%

Social Sciences 3

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free