Towards a general modeling framework of resource competition in cognitive development

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The current paper presents an integrated formal model of typical and atypical development based on the mechanisms of mutualism and resource competition. The mutualistic network model is extended with the dynamics of competition for limited resources, such as time and environmental factors. The proposed model generates patterns that resemble established phenomena in cognitive development: the positive manifold, developmental phases, developmental delays and lack of early indicators in atypical development, developmental regression, and “quasi-autism” caused by extreme environmental deprivation. The presented modeling framework fits a general movement towards formal theory construction in psychology. The model is easy to replicate and develop further, and we offer several avenues for future work.

References Powered by Scopus

Rational choice and the structure of the environment

3707Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A network theory of mental disorders

1907Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Definition of Dyslexia

1364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Formalizing theories of child development: Introduction to the special section

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advancing the Network Theory of Mental Disorders: A Computational Model of Panic Disorder

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How Ideology Shapes Legal Concepts: The Case of Public Order

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Ron, J., Deserno, M., Robinaugh, D., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2023). Towards a general modeling framework of resource competition in cognitive development. Child Development, 94(6), 1432–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13973

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

63%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Neuroscience 1

13%

Computer Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0