Cautionary tales in the interpretation of clinical studies involving older persons

75Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The care of patients 65 years or older presents a challenge for evidence-based medicine. Such patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, are more vulnerable to treatment-induced harm, and often are unable to fully participate in treatment decisions. We outline several cautionary themes in the interpretation of clinical studies of therapeutic interventions involving older persons as they apply to processes of everyday clinical decision making. In particular, we focus on issues of study design and quality of evidence, choice of outcome measures, missing outcome data, assessment of potential harm, quantifying treatment effects in individual patients (and adjusting these for effect modifiers and reduced life expectancy), eliciting patient values and preferences, prioritizing therapeutic goals and selection of treatments, and assisting patients in adhering to agreed therapeutic regimens. ©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, I. A., & Guyatt, G. H. (2010, April 12). Cautionary tales in the interpretation of clinical studies involving older persons. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free