The fallacy of thinking conventionally about nuclear weapons

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapter passionately argues in favour of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament as vital objectives to save humanity from certain catastrophe. The fact is that a nuclear weapon is not a weapon in the conventional semantic sense. It is not a rational means to a rational end; it is an instrument of unlimited, universal destruction. Hence, the threat or the actuality of a nuclear war is not a rational instrument of national policy but rather an instrument of suicide and genocide. This also makes nuclear disarmament utterly different from the conventional one.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morgenthau, H. J. (2017). The fallacy of thinking conventionally about nuclear weapons. In Arms Control and Disarmament: 50 Years of Experience in Nuclear Education (pp. 79–89). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62259-0_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free