High resolution remote sensing for reducing uncertainties in urban forest carbon offset life cycle assessments

19Citations
Citations of this article
159Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Urban forests reduce greenhouse gas emissions by storing and sequestering considerable amounts of carbon. However, few studies have considered the local scale of urban forests to effectively evaluate their potential long-term carbon offset. The lack of precise, consistent and up-to-date forest details is challenging for long-term prognoses. Therefore, this review aims to identify uncertainties in urban forest carbon offset assessment and discuss the extent to which such uncertainties can be reduced by recent progress in high resolution remote sensing. We do this by performing an extensive literature review and a case study combining remote sensing and life cycle assessment of urban forest carbon offset in Berlin, Germany. Main text: Recent progress in high resolution remote sensing and methods is adequate for delivering more precise details on the urban tree canopy, individual tree metrics, species, and age structures compared to conventional land use/cover class approaches. These area-wide consistent details can update life cycle inventories for more precise future prognoses. Additional improvements in classification accuracy can be achieved by a higher number of features derived from remote sensing data of increasing resolution, but first studies on this subject indicated that a smart selection of features already provides sufficient data that avoids redundancies and enables more efficient data processing. Our case study from Berlin could use remotely sensed individual tree species as consistent inventory of a life cycle assessment. However, a lack of growth, mortality and planting data forced us to make assumptions, therefore creating uncertainty in the long-term prognoses. Regarding temporal changes and reliable long-term estimates, more attention is required to detect changes of gradual growth, pruning and abrupt changes in tree planting and mortality. As such, precise long-term urban ecological monitoring using high resolution remote sensing should be intensified, especially due to increasing climate change effects. This is important for calibrating and validating recent prognoses of urban forest carbon offset, which have so far scarcely addressed longer timeframes. Additionally, higher resolution remote sensing of urban forest carbon estimates can improve upscaling approaches, which should be extended to reach a more precise global estimate for the first time. Conclusions: Urban forest carbon offset can be made more relevant by making more standardized assessments available for science and professional practitioners, and the increasing availability of high resolution remote sensing data and the progress in data processing allows for precisely that.

References Powered by Scopus

Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review

2296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species

1129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA

1123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Remote sensing of urban green spaces: A review

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remote sensing in urban forestry: Recent applications and future directions

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating urban above ground biomass with multi-scale LiDAR

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tigges, J., & Lakes, T. (2017, October 4). High resolution remote sensing for reducing uncertainties in urban forest carbon offset life cycle assessments. Carbon Balance and Management. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0085-x

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 54

71%

Researcher 11

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 30

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18

28%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 10

15%

Engineering 7

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0