Direct evidence of lack of colocalisation of fluorescently labelled gold labels used in correlative light electron microscopy

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fluorescently labelled nanoparticles are routinely used in Correlative Light Electron Microscopy (CLEM) to combine the capabilities of two separate microscope platforms: Fluorescent light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM). The inherent assumption is that the fluorescent label observed under LM colocalises well with the electron dense nanoparticle observed in EM. Herein we show, by combining single molecule fluorescent imaging with optical detection of the scattering from single gold nanoparticles, that for a commercially produced sample of 10 nm gold nanoparticles tagged to Alexa-633 there is in fact no colocalisation between the fluorescent signatures of Alexa-633 and the scattering associated with the gold nanoparticle. This shows that the attached gold nanoparticle quenches the fluorescent signal by ∼95%, or less likely that the complex has dissociated. In either scenario, the observed fluorescent signal in fact arises from a large population of untagged fluorophores; rendering these labels potentially ineffective and misleading to the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miles, B. T., Greenwood, A. B., Benito-Alifonso, D., Tanner, H., Galan, M. C., Verkade, P., & Gersen, H. (2017). Direct evidence of lack of colocalisation of fluorescently labelled gold labels used in correlative light electron microscopy. Scientific Reports, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free