Conflicts in human operator - Unmanned vehicles interactions

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the context of the supervision of one or several unmanned vehicles by a human operator, the definition and the dynamics of the shared authority among these agents is a major challenge. Indeed, lessons learned from modern aviation reveals that authority sharing issues between aircrews and on-board processes are remarkable precursors of air accidents (twenty accidents in the last twenty years). The analysis of these events highlights that the authority of the on-board processes is designed a priori and fails to adapt in case of conflict with the aircrew's actions. Moreover the poor design of the HMIs (e.g. : there is no dialogue between artificial and human agents) and the complexity of the interactions may lead the aircrews to lose situation awareness and to enter a perseveration syndrome. We present the basic concepts of an approach aiming at dynamically adjusting the autonomy of an agent in a mission relatively to its operator, based on formal detection of conflict. An experimental set-up is under construction to assess our hypotheses. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dehais, F., Mercier, S., & Tessier, C. (2009). Conflicts in human operator - Unmanned vehicles interactions. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5639 LNAI, pp. 498–507). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02728-4_53

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free