Abstract
Our understanding of the Aurignacian/Gravettian transition has changed focus during the last decade: while former investigations mainly tried to define technotypological units of artefact types and their evolutionary macrotrends, the evaluation of geoscientific data in improved chronological frameworks now provide surprising potential. Specifying the data record can at the very least contribute to the question of a possible “late Aurignacian” or “Epi-Aurignacian” (Kozlowski 1996, 1999) in Eastern Europe, and may even offer some new scenarios of that cultural change.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gowlett, J. A. J. (2009). The Longest Transition or Multiple Revolutions? In Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions (pp. 65–78). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76487-0_4
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
