Reentry During A Pandemic: A Pilot Study of Access to Peer Support Through Technology to Reduce Social Isolation

3Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Returning to society after incarceration is a challenging and stressful process, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this difficult transition. Although previous research has identified social connectedness as reducing stress and improving wellbeing during stressful life events, much of this research has not addressed prison reentry, despite the relevance to the challenges faced by this unique group of individuals. Additionally, examining how such support can be provided during the COVID-19 pandemic with required social distancing, stay-at-home orders, and business shutdowns has not been studied. This study examines the Offender Alumni Association (OAA), a program operated entirely by formerly incarcerated persons, and its ability to provide social support through obstacles created by reentry and the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on focus groups and surveys of OAA members (N = 77) and non-OAA members (N = 41), we find that, when compared to the comparison group of non-OAA members, those in OAA reported significantly stronger social support and less social isolation. Such results strengthen the argument that within-group support matters in providing protection against the impacts of stressful life events. Further, OAA participants overwhelmingly supported the use of technology during times of crisis as a means to feel connected and supported. Findings indicate that technology can support vulnerable groups and protect public health simultaneously. Further, findings reveal important policy implications, as well as arguments to use technology to expand programming during reentry. (230 Words).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moak, S. C., Leban, L., & Reuter, T. K. (2023). Reentry During A Pandemic: A Pilot Study of Access to Peer Support Through Technology to Reduce Social Isolation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(5), 1204–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09690-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free