For Reason’s Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Everybody knows the kind of argumentation of the ‘Look out! Do you want to get run over?’-type. In these argumentations a standpoint, which is not always presented as one, is defended by an argumentation, which may pose as a question, often called ‘rhetorical’, or which otherwise does not show itself directly as an argumentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eemeren, F. H. (2015). For Reason’s Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 27, pp. 331–345). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free