Creating Type 1 fonts from METAFONT sources: Comparison of tools, techniques and results

2Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper summarizes experiences in converting METAFONT fonts to PostScript fonts with TEXtrace and mftrace, based on programs of autotracing bitmaps (AutoTrace and potrace), and with systems using analytic conversion (MetaFog and MetaTypel, using METAPOST output or METAPOST itself). A development process is demonstrated with public Indic fonts (Devanagari, Malayalam). Examples from the Computer Modern fonts have been also included to illustrate common problems of conversion. Features, advantages and disadvantages of various techniques are discussed. Postprocessing - corrections, optimization and (auto)hinting - or even preprocessing may be necessary, before even a primary contour approximation is achieved. To do fully automatic conversion of a perfect METAFONT glyph definition into perfect Type 1 outline curves is very difficult at best, perhaps impossible. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Píška, K. (2004). Creating Type 1 fonts from METAFONT sources: Comparison of tools, techniques and results. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3130, 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27773-6_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free