Information, negation, and paraconsistency

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper begins by arguing that a truth conditional approach to the semantics for relevant logic is unnatural. Rather, we should adopt an informational semantics. On this view, the indices in the model theory are not possible or impossible worlds, but are situations. A statement is not true or false at a situation; rather a situation can be said either to contain or fail to contain certain pieces of information. Valid inference, then, is seen as information preservation, not truth preservation. The distinction between truth and information gives us some freedom in our treatment of logic. For example, we may have a very classical theory of truth but a very non-classical theory of information. On the other hand, we may accept very non-classical theories of truth (such as dialetheism) together with an informational treatment of logic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mares, E. D. (2013). Information, negation, and paraconsistency. In Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications (pp. 43–55). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free