The Seow Operative Score (SOS) as a decision-making adjunct for paediatric Chiari I malformation: a preliminary study

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The natural history of Chiari I malformation (C1M) in the paediatric population is poorly understood. There are conflicting reports with regards to surgical indications, operative techniques and peri-operative prognostic indicators. In this paper, we report our institutional experience in the management of paediatric C1M. Methods: The workflow process which includes preferred imaging modalities, surgical techniques and indications for intervention is discussed. In particular, we describe one of our current projects—an in-house designed Seow Operative Score (SOS) as a feasibility scoring system for neurosurgical intervention in our local cohort of paediatric C1M patients. Results: In our series, we have 2 groups: 10 non-operated patients versus 19 operated patients. In the non-operated group, the majority of patients had a SOS of 0 to 1. One patient had a score of 2.5 and was kept under close surveillance. Follow-up imaging demonstrated resolution of the cerebellar herniation and intraspinal syrinx. In the operated group, 17 patients had a SOS of 3 or more. Two patients had a SOS of 2. For these 2, 1 developed progressive symptoms, and the other had an extensive cervico-thoracic syrinx. Decision was made for surgery after a period of surveillance. Conclusions: In this paper, we report our institutional experience in managing paediatric C1M and, at the same time, highlight salient points of our practices. Meanwhile, we advocate collective global efforts and in-depth research for better disease understanding of this challenging condition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Low, S. Y. Y., Ng, L. P., Tan, A. J. L., Low, D. C. Y., & Seow, W. T. (2019). The Seow Operative Score (SOS) as a decision-making adjunct for paediatric Chiari I malformation: a preliminary study. Child’s Nervous System, 35(10), 1777–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04226-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free