The influence of a metal stent on the distribution of thermal energy during irreversible electroporation

36Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) uses short duration, high-voltage electrical pulses to induce cell death via nanoscale defects resulting from altered transmembrane potential. The technique is gaining interest for ablations in unresectable pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancer. Metal stents are often used for palliative biliary drainage in these patients, but are currently seen as an absolute contraindication for IRE due to the perceived risk of direct heating of the metal and its surroundings. This study investigates the thermal and tissue viability changes due to a metal stent during IRE. Methods: IRE was performed in a homogeneous tissue model (polyacrylamide gel), without and with a metal stent placed perpendicular and parallel to the electrodes, delivering 90 and 270 pulses (15-35 A, 90 μsec, 1.5 cm active tip exposure, 1.5 cm interelectrode distance, 1000-1500 V/cm, 90 pulses/min), and in-vivo in a porcine liver (4 ablations). Temperature changes were measured with an infrared thermal camera and with fiber-optic probes. Tissue viability after in-vivo IRE was investigated macroscopically using 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) vitality staining. Results: In the gel, direct stent-heating was not observed. Contrarily, the presence of a stent between the electrodes caused a higher increase in median temperature near the electrodes (23.2 vs 13.3°C [90 pulses]; p = 0.021, and 33.1 vs 24.8°C [270 pulses]; p = 0.242). In-vivo, no temperature difference was observed for ablations with and without a stent. Tissue examination showed white coagulation 1mm around the electrodes only. A rim of vital tissue remained around the stent, whereas ablation without stent resulted in complete tissue avitality. Conclusion: IRE in the vicinity of a metal stent does not cause notable direct heating of the metal, but results in higher temperatures around the electrodes and remnant viable tissue. Future studies should determine for which clinical indications IRE in the presence of metal stents is safe and effective.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Setup of IRE ablations performed in a tissue phantom. (A) electrodes parallel to stent; (B) electrodes perpendicular to stent; (C) electrodes without stent.
  • Fig 2. Setup of IRE ablations performed in in-vivo porcine liver showing the electrodes (brown/gray) and temperature probes (blue). No-stent-IRE (A, cross-sectional; B, longitudinal) and stent-IRE (C, crosssectional; D, longitudinal). Green arrow represents the distance to the liver surface.
  • Table 1. Absolute maximum temperature increasemeasured between the electrodes and at the tip of the electrodes.
  • Table 2. Median current at the first pulse of each ablation in tissue phantom (range).
  • Fig 3. No-stent-IRE. Thermal camera images during 90 pulses (A-D). (E) Graph showing the temperature increase at the surface of the gel 5 mm from (I) the active tip of the electrode and (II) in between the electrodes. (A) pre-IRE (B) after 50 IRE pulses (C) after 90 IRE pulses (D) 75 seconds after last IRE pulse.
  • Fig 4. Stent-IRE, parallel. Thermal camera images during 90 pulses (A-D). (E) Graph showing the temperature increase at the surface of the gel 5 mm from (I) the active tip of the electrode and (II) the stent. (A) pre IRE (B) after 50 IRE pulses (C) after 90 IRE pulses (D) 75 seconds after last IRE pulse.
  • Fig 5. Stent-IRE, perpendicular. Thermal camera images during 90 pulses (A-D). (E) Graph showing the temperature increase at the surface of the gel, 5 mm from (I) the active tip of the electrode, (II) inside the stent and (III) at the margin of the stent. (A) pre-IRE (B) after 60 IRE pulses (C) after 90 IRE pulses (D) 60 sec after the last IRE pulse.
  • Table 3. Current increase during in vitro IRE.

References Powered by Scopus

Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation

1132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early phase acute myocardial infarct size quantification: Validation of the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride tissue enzyme staining technique

866Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Irreversible electroporation: A new ablation modality - Clinical implications

673Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Irreversible electroporation and thermal ablation of tumors in the liver, lung, kidney and bone: What are the differences?

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Work-up, staging, and local intervention strategies

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheffer, H. J., Vogel, J. A., Van Den Bos, W., Neal, R. E., Van Lienden, K. P., Besselink, M. G. H., … Verdaasdonk, R. M. (2016). The influence of a metal stent on the distribution of thermal energy during irreversible electroporation. PLoS ONE, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148457

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

62%

Researcher 10

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

65%

Engineering 9

24%

Social Sciences 2

5%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0