Valid evaluation of volatile flavor composition of fresh and dehydrated Tuber indicum with different drying methods

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effects of three drying methods on volatile flavor components of Tuber indicum were studied. After hot air drying (AD), vacuumdrying (VD), and vacuum-freeze drying (FD), flavor components were analyzed by headspace solid phase microextraction GC-MS and electronic nose (E-nose). The results from GC-MS showed that aldehydes (54.8%) and alcohols (31.4%) are the two dominant chemical species in fresh T. indicum and eight carbon (C8) compounds including 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol, n-octanol, 3-octanone. After dehydrating, C8 compounds, aldehyde, and ester components reduced, while alkanes, heterocyclic, and sulfur components were produced. Multivariate statistical analysis of the GC-MS revealed the components responsible for the chemical differences between fresh and three drying samples. In addition, E-nose could discriminate fresh and three drying samples. The result obtained by E-nose showed good identity compared with GC–MS. Therefore, FD was the optimal dehydrating method to preserve Tuberaceae with the most retained fresh flavor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, N., Pei, F., Yu, J., Wang, S., Ho, C. T., Su, K., & Hu, Q. (2018). Valid evaluation of volatile flavor composition of fresh and dehydrated Tuber indicum with different drying methods. CYTA - Journal of Food, 16(1), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2017.1413011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free