Demutualization and demand for reinsurance

11Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates whether U.S. property-liability insurers change their demand for reinsurance after demutualization. Our empirical results show that the overall demand for reinsurance of converting insurers is not statistically different after the conversion. Furthermore, we find that converting insurers decrease the demand for reinsurance from non-affiliated reinsurers, but increase the demand for reinsurance from affiliated reinsurers after the conversion. One possible explanation is that converting insurers may treat reinsurance to affiliated reinsurers as risk retention rather than risk transfer so that they can reduce reinsurance cost. Another interesting finding is that converting insurers increase demand for reinsurance from non-affiliated reinsurers before conversion. © 2008 The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics.

References Powered by Scopus

Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics

980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimistic reporting in the property- casualty insurance industry

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonparametric estimation of sample selection models

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An analysis of reinsurance and firm performance: Evidence from the Taiwan property-liability insurance industry

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cash holdings between public and private insurers ‒ a partial adjustment approach

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk transfer beyond reinsurance: the added value of CAT bonds

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, J. L., Chang, V. Y., Lai, G. C., & Tzeng, L. Y. (2008). Demutualization and demand for reinsurance. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 33(3), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2008.17

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

56%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

44%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free