Effectiveness of a brief intervention for acceptance of influenza vaccine in reluctant primary care patients

3Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a brief intervention in increasing influenza vaccination coverage compared with the usual advice in people who refuse it, and to record the main reasons for refusing to be vaccinated. Method: A cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in which the study population was individuals with high risk factors who initially had refused to be vaccinated against influenza. Professionals (doctors and nurses) who voluntarily accepted to participate were assigned randomly to the intervention group (brief intervention) and the control group (usual advice). Results: 57 professionals recruited 524 people who had previously declined the influenza vaccination (271 in the control group and 253 in the intervention group). Brief intervention showed its effectiveness with an odds ratio of 2.48 (1.61-3.82; p < 0.001), in individuals aged 60 or over, both healthy or with risk factors. The most frequent reasons for rejection of vaccination were the belief that there was no risk of getting sick (53.0%) and the fear of the side effects (33.3%). Conclusions: Brief intervention is an effective tool in improving vaccination coverage in people who have initially rejected it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muñoz-Miralles, R., Bonvehí Nadeu, S., Sant Masoliver, C., Martín Gallego, A., Gómez del Canto, J., Mendioroz Peña, J., & Bonet Esteve, A. M. (2022). Effectiveness of a brief intervention for acceptance of influenza vaccine in reluctant primary care patients. Gaceta Sanitaria, 36(5), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.01.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free