The boundaries of unemployment institutional rules and real-life experiences

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This text examines current trends in unemployment by focusing on its boundaries. These are considered as fluctuating, and two aspects of their dynamics are successively analysed. A first institutional dimension refers to the evolution of norms and rules contributing to the establishment of social and legal statuses and to access to material resources (unemployment benefits, employment policy measures). A second, biographical, dimension focuses on subjective experiences, including the meanings invested in the unemployed condition (affiliation, identity claims) and future projections (accessible and valued positions). We argue that these two types of boundaries evolve in contradictory directions: a contraction and an enlargement of unemployment. These contradictory tendencies ultimately challenge the permanence of the category of unemployment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demazière, D. (2018). The boundaries of unemployment institutional rules and real-life experiences. In The Deconstruction of Employment as a Political Question: “Employment” as a Floating Signifier (pp. 223–245). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93617-8_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free