Shared Feelings and Joint Feeling: The Problem of Collective Affective Intentionality Specified

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter I discuss Hans Bernhard Schmid’s account of shared feelings which elaborates on the idea that affective intentionality is a matter of world-directed feelings. I reconstruct the philosophical problem Schmid is seeking to solve, which I call The Problem of Shared Feelings. This problem concerns the conflict between two deep-seated intuitions: the intuition that we humans can come to feel together and the intuition that only individuals, and not groups, can be understood as legitimate subjects of feeling. I expose Schmid’s solution to this riddle which attempts to show that feelings can be shared in a non-metaphorical sense of the verb ‘to share’; the point being that collective affective intentionality can be claimed to be a matter of shared feelings. Seeking to motivate a suggestion concerning the terms in which we should conceive of collective affective intentionality, I articulate a question Schmid’s proposal may be argued to leave unanswered: what does it mean for two (or more) qualitatively different feelings to ‘match’ one another? I argue that, in order to offer a qualified answer to this question, we could appeal to a suggestion Schmid may be taken to make in a later version of his analysis of shared feelings: at the heart of a collective affective intentional episode we always find a shared concern. This thought, I propose, indicates a direction we could take in order to spell out a phenomenologically adequate account of collective affective intentionality along the lines of the view proposed at the end of Chap. 3.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sánchez Guerrero, H. A. (2016). Shared Feelings and Joint Feeling: The Problem of Collective Affective Intentionality Specified. In Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality (pp. 97–127). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33735-7_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free