Forensic anthropology and forensic pathology the state of the art

41Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstact: This chapter presents a critical analysis of forensic anthropology. An evaluation of the conception of forensic anthropology across European and American countries is attempted. Furthermore, the authors set out to identify the growing fields in which the anthropologist is involved, alone or together with forensic pathologists. Certification, training requirements, and teaching are rather heterogeneous across the several countries analyzed. Yet, although the forensic anthropologist profile is not easy to achieve, particularly across Europe, the authors were able to identify some efforts-not yet enough,however-toward the uniformization of the most reliable procedures in order to face the increasing and new challenges of forensic anthropology. The authors recognize at least 11 sub-areas in which the forensic anthropologist can be involved, which is a good witness of the exponential growth of this discipline in recent years. © 2006 Humana Press Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cunha, E., & Cattaneo, C. (2006). Forensic anthropology and forensic pathology the state of the art. In Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences From Recovery to Cause of Death (pp. 39–53). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free