Franz Rosenzweig and Karl Jaspers both made references to Schelling’s Philosophie derOffenbarung. Despite his overall favorable reception, Jaspers disagreed with Schelling’s ontological certainty of faith; in contrast, Rosenzweig develops in his Stern der Erlösung how Schelling succeeded with overcoming idealism in favor of a “new thinking.” From these two contrasting interpretations it becomes clear that careful study of Schelling’s philosophy allows for acontemporary perspective to the problem of philosophical faith-a position that was demonstrated by Leonard H. Ehrlich.
CITATION STYLE
Schmied-Kowarzik, W. (2012). Philosophy of revelation: Remarks on Schelling, Jaspers, and Rosenzweig. In Philosophical Faith and the Future of Humanity (pp. 147–157). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2223-1_13
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.