Whiteness, Imperial Anxiety, and the Global 1930s: The White British League Debate in Hong Kong

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What is a British colony for, and who is it for? These were the questions at the crux of a public debate in 1933 in Hong Kong sparked by a British resident claiming to have formed an organization for the protection and advancement of the British white race. This article explores how anxieties about fascism, white privilege, and others in the empire allowed the very idea of such a political movement to be elevated to the subject of heated debate. The discussion on British unemployment, poor whites, and European intruders in the colony tells us less about the actual socioeconomic conditions that Hong Kong Britons faced than about their subjective experience of being British in an imperial context. The articulation of imperial anxiety also shows us how the fluid, ambiguous borders of whiteness and Britishness were negotiated at the intersections of nationalism, ethnicity, class, and race. Highlighting the global perspectives demonstrated in the debate and the various transnational networks across Hong Kong, this article argues that the debate was as much about global sociopolitical circumstances as about what was happening in Hong Kong. It therefore offers a timely opportunity to rethink how the local, national, regional, and global were interwoven in the global 1930s, even among the English reading public in the British colony of Hong Kong.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kong, V. (2020, April 1). Whiteness, Imperial Anxiety, and the Global 1930s: The White British League Debate in Hong Kong. Journal of British Studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2019.292

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free