Iodine status of postpartum women and their infants in Australia after the introduction of mandatory iodine fortification

22Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mandatory I fortification in bread was introduced in Australia in 2009 in response to the re-emergence of biochemical I deficiency based on median urinary I concentration (UIC)<100 μg/l. Data on the I status of lactating mothers and their infants in Australia are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to assess the I status, determined by UIC and breast milk I concentration (BMIC), of breast-feeding mothers in South Australia and UIC of their infants. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between the I status of mothers and their infants. The median UIC of the mothers (n 686) was 125 (interquartile range (IQR) 76-200) μg/l and median BMIC (n 538) was 127 (IQR 84-184) μg/l. In all, 38 and 36 % of the mothers had a UIC and BMIC below 100 μg/l, respectively. The median UIC of infants (n 628) was 198 (IQR 121-296) μg/l, and 17 % had UIC<100 μg/l. Infant UIC was positively associated with maternal UIC (β 0·26; 95 % CI 0·14, 0·37, P<0·001) and BMIC (β 0·85; 95 % CI 0·66, 1·04, P<0·001) at 3 months postpartum after adjustment for gestational age, parity, maternal secondary and further education, BMI category and infant feeding mode. The adjusted OR for infant UIC<100 μg/l was 6·49 (95 % CI 3·80, 11·08, P<0·001) in mothers with BMIC<100 μg/l compared with those with BMIC≥100 μg/l. The I status of mothers and breast-fed infants in South Australia, following mandatory I fortification, is indicative of I sufficiency. BMIC<100 μg/l increased the risk of biochemical I deficiency in breast-fed infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huynh, D., Condo, D., Gibson, R., Muhlhausler, B., Ryan, P., Skeaff, S., … Zhou, S. J. (2017). Iodine status of postpartum women and their infants in Australia after the introduction of mandatory iodine fortification. British Journal of Nutrition, 117(12), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001775

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free