Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment to Cemeteries Pollution through GIS-Based DRASTIC Index

17Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Deposition of corpses in the ground is the most common burial practice, which can allow interactions between polluting compounds and the soil, groundwater, and surface water, which may afterwards lead to negative environmental impacts and risks to public health. The risk of cemeteries contaminating groundwater is related to their location, the quantity of clothes, metals and adornments buried, and geographical, geological, hydrogeological, and climatic factors. Using the DRASTIC index and geographical information system (GIS) tools, the potential for groundwater contamination was investigated in eight cemeteries located in the Figueira da Foz region (Portugal), which are the main anthropogenic pollution sources in the area. Aquifer vulnerability was assessed through the development of thirteen site characteristic maps, seven thematic maps, and a DRASTIC index vulnerability map, using GIS operation tools. No studies were found on the development of vulnerability maps with this method and digital tools. Cemeteries UC2, UC4, UC5, UC6, UC7, and UC8 are located within the zones susceptible to recharge, with an average recharge rate of 254 mm/year. Cemeteries UC5, UC7, and UC8 are expected to develop a greater water-holding capacity. The water table depth is more vulnerable at UC6, varying between 9.1 m and 15.2 m. However, results show only a high vulnerability associated with the UC4 cemetery with the contributions T,C > R,S > I > A > D, which should be under an environmental monitoring program. The area surrounding UC4 is characterized by a water table depth ranging between 15.2 m to 22.9 m, mainly fine-grained sands in both the vadose zone and the aquifer media, Gleyic Solonchaks at the topsoil, very unfavorable slope (0–2%), and high hydraulic conductivity (>81.5 m/day). The sensitivity analysis shows that the topography, soil media, and aquifer media weights were the most effective in the vulnerability assessment. However, the highest contributions to index variation were made by hydraulic conductivity, net recharge, and soil media. This type of approach not only makes it possible to assess the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination from cemeteries but also allows the definition of environmental monitoring plans as well as provides the entities responsible for its management and surveillance with a methodology and tools for its continuous monitoring.

References Powered by Scopus

Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems

537Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationships between soil pH and microbial properties in a UK arable soil

471Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods

457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Spatial evaluation of groundwater vulnerability using the DRASTIC-L model with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and GIS approaches in Edo State, Nigeria

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A GIS-Based Comparative Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Modified-DRASTIC, Modified-SINTACS and NV Index in a Porous Aquifer, Greece

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to contamination using the DRASTIC model and GIS functions in Doukkala Plain, Morocco

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonçalves, V., Albuquerque, A., Carvalho, P., Almeida, P., & Cavaleiro, V. (2023). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment to Cemeteries Pollution through GIS-Based DRASTIC Index. Water (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040812

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

72%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 8

47%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

29%

Engineering 3

18%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free