The newly proposed clinical and post-neoadjuvant treatment staging classifications for gastric adenocarcinoma for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging

42Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: New stage grouping classifications for clinical (cStage) and post-neoadjuvant treatment (ypStage) stage for gastric adenocarcinoma have been proposed for the eighth edition of the AJCC manual. This article summarizes the analysis for these stages. Methods: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed in 2004–2009 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The cStage cohort included both surgical and nonsurgical cases, and the ypStage cohort included only patients who had chemotherapy or radiation therapy before surgery. Survival differences between the stage groups were determined by the log-rank test and prognostic accuracy was assessed by concordance index. Analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Results: Five strata for cStage and four strata for ypStage were developed. The 5-year survival rates for cStages were 56.77%, 47.39%, 33.1%, 25.9%, and 5.0% for stages I, IIa, IIb, III, and IV, respectively, and the rates for ypStage were 74.2%, 46.3%, 19.2%, and 11.6% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The log-rank test showed that survival differences were well stratified and stage groupings were ordered and distinct (p < 0.0001). The proposed cStage and ypStage classification was sensitive and specific and had high prognostic accuracy (cStage: c index = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.79–0.83; ypStage: c index = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.73–0.87). Conclusion: The proposed eighth edition establishes two new staging schemata that provide essential prognostic data for patients before treatment and for patients who have undergone surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. These additions are a significant advance to the AJCC staging manual and will provide critical guidance to clinicians in making informed decisions throughout the treatment course.

References Powered by Scopus

The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States

1651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: Model specific population value and confidence interval estimation

1253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multi-institutional trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma

327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of mri in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ribophorin II potentiates P-glycoprotein- and ABCG2-mediated multidrug resistance via activating ERK pathway in gastric cancer

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

In, H., Ravetch, E., Langdon-Embry, M., Palis, B., Ajani, J. A., Hofstetter, W. L., … Sano, T. (2018). The newly proposed clinical and post-neoadjuvant treatment staging classifications for gastric adenocarcinoma for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. Gastric Cancer, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0765-y

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

67%

Researcher 6

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

88%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0