Predominance of comorbidities in the detriment of daily activity in sarcoidosis patients

5Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sarcoidosis may affect lung function, working ability, overall mobility, and daily activity. In the present study we performed an analysis of clinical settings in patients with sarcoidosis to disentangle its influence on daily physical activity (PA). PA assessment (number of steps per day, daily energy expenditure) was performed by accelerometry during consecutive 7 days after discharge from hospital. Thirty patients with sarcoidosis, aged 46.4 ± 10.5, were enrolled in the study. Clinical data (age, gender, steroid consumption, weight, and comorbidities), lung function tests (forced expiratory volume in one second – FEV1, forced vital capacity – FVC, and lung diffusion for carbon monoxide – DLCO), mobility (6-minute walk test – 6 MWT) and physical performance (oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold – VO2/AT) were estimated. The mean daily PA (5214 ± 2699 steps/day) and VO2max (22.3 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min) were lower when referenced to the age-group predicted values. A significant greater daily PA was observed in sarcoidosis patients without comorbidities compared with those having more than two comorbidities (p = 0.046). No association was found between steroid use, lung function, and 6MWT. Daily PA was associated with patients aerobic efficacy and VO2max (r = 0.38, p < 0.04). The findings demonstrate a significant influence of comorbidities on sarcoidosis patients’ exercise tolerance and daily PA. Special treatment considerations, including the potential impact of comorbidities, may help optimize exercise regimes, link physical activity with health, and prevent sarcoidosis complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kostorz, S., Jastrzębski, D., Sikora, M., Zebrowska, A., Margas, A., Stepanik, D., … Ziora, D. (2018). Predominance of comorbidities in the detriment of daily activity in sarcoidosis patients. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 1040, pp. 7–12). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2017_87

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free