Five per cent measurements of the growth rate from silation-based modelling of redshift-space clustering in BOSS LOWZ

51Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We use a silation-based modelling approach to analyse the anisotropic clustering of the BOSS LOWZ sample over the radial range $0.4h{-1}{Mpc}$ to $63h{-1}{Mpc}$, significantly extending what is possible with a purely analytic modelling framework. Our full-scale analysis yields constraints on the growth of structure that are a factor of two more stringent than any other study on large scales at similar redshifts. We infer f8 = 0.471 ± 0.024 at $z$ ≈ 0.25, and f8 = 0.430 ± 0.025 at $z$ ≈ 0.40; the corresponding ΛCDM predictions of the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) analysis are 0.470 ± 0.006 and 0.476 ± 0.005, respectively. Our results are thus consistent with Planck, but also follow the trend seen in previous low-redshift measurements of f8 falling slightly below the ΛCDM + CMB prediction. We find that small- and large-radial scales yield tually consistent values of f8, but there are 1-2.5 hints of small scales ($< 10h{-1}{Mpc}$) preferring lower values for f8 relative to larger scales. We analyse the constraining power of the full range of radial scales, finding that most of the ltipole infoation about f8 is contained in the scales $2h{-1}{Mpc}s 20h{-1}{Mpc}$. Evidently, once the cosmological infoation of the quasi-to-nonlinear regime has been harvested, large-scale modes contain only modest additional infoation about structure growth. Finally, we compare predictions for the galaxy-galaxy lensing amplitude of the two samples against measurements from SDSS and assess the lensing-is-low effect in light of our findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lange, J. U., Hearin, A. P., Leauthaud, A., Van Den Bosch, F. C., Guo, H., & Derose, J. (2022). Five per cent measurements of the growth rate from silation-based modelling of redshift-space clustering in BOSS LOWZ. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509(2), 1779–1804. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free