Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We contrast and compare three ways of predicting efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game. The three alternatives are based on ordinal potential, quantal response and impulse balance theory. We report an experiment designed to test the respective predictions and find that impulse balance gives the best predictions. A simple expression detailing when enforced contributions result in high or low efficiency is provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cartwright, E., & Stepanova, A. (2017). Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game. International Journal of Game Theory, 46(4), 1163–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-017-0570-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free