Hegel’s Critique of Foundationalism and Its Implications for Husserl’s Dream of Rigorous Science

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hegel sees philosophy as the only rigorous science that does not have any presupposition, but he rejects the possibility of an absolute foundation for philosophy, instead maintaining that only the system as a whole can be free from all presuppositions. Hegel’s system lays claim to presuppositionlessness, not on the ground of any presuppositionless beginning, but rather as a holistic system of concepts in which inevitable presuppositions are made transparent and comprehended. This paper examines Hegel’s analysis of the concept of immediacy and his critique of the foundationalist conception of philosophy. Although Hegel’s critique is targeted against his predecessors and contemporaries, it has important implications for Husserl’s phenomenology, which represents one of the most ambitious foundationalist projects in the history of philosophy. The final part discusses the later development of Husserl’s thought and his introduction of the concept of lifeworld in light of Hegel’s critique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lau, C. F. (2019). Hegel’s Critique of Foundationalism and Its Implications for Husserl’s Dream of Rigorous Science. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 102, pp. 61–75). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17546-7_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free